Woll v. County of Lake et al
Dallas Woll |
County of Lake, Mary Jane Figalde and Henry Bouillerce |
3:2007cv06299 |
December 13, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Lake |
Wayne D. Brazil |
Bernard Zimmerman |
Both |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/21/2008. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2008) |
Filing 44 STIPULATION AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/17/2008. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2008) |
Filing 42 ORDER Granting 41 Stipulation re Extension concerning filing of Pre-Trial Documents filed by County of Lake.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/4/08. (sv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2008) |
Filing 39 ORDER Granting in part denying in part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 10/21/08. (sv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2008) |
Filing 27 BRIEFING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/12/2008. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2008) |
Filing 20 ORDER Granting Dismissal of individual defendants Mary Jane Figalde and Henry Bouillerce. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/9/08. (sv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.