Gaytan v. Chao
Plaintiff: Richard Gaytan
Defendant: Elaine Chao
Case Number: 3:2007cv06367
Filed: December 17, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Labor: Other Office
County: Stanislaus
Presiding Judge: Vaughn R. Walker
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 05:704 Labor Litigation

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 68 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE from 9/2/2010 to 11/4/2010 at 3:30 PM, re doc 67 Stipulation filed by Elaine Chao. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 9/2/2010. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2010)
July 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 64 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE from 8/12/2010 to 9/2/2010 at 3:30 PM, re 62 filed by Elaine Chao. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 7/20/2010. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2010)
April 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DATES re 40 filed by Elaine Chao. The date for completing mediation is 6/30/2009. The date for expert disclosures is 7/16/2009. The fact discovery cutoff date is 7/31/2009. The date for rebuttal expert dis closures is 8/14/2009. The last day for expert discovery is 9/18/2009. Dispositive Motion hearing date is 11/19/2009 at 2:30 PM. The Pretrial Conference is continued to 12/17/2009 at 3:30 PM. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 4/9/2009. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2009)
March 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER re 17 MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiff ordered to submit response to motion to dismiss within fourteen days. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2009)
February 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL DATES re 34 filed by Elaine Chao. The date for expert disclosures is 4/13/2009. The fact discovery cutoff date is 4/27/2009. The date for rebuttal expert disclosures is 5/13/2009. The last day for exper t discovery is 6/17/2009. Dispositive motion hearing date is 8/6/2009 at 2:30 PM. Pretrial Conference: 9/10/2009 at 3:30 PM. SUBMITTING COUNSEL IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS ORDER UPON ALL OTHER PARTIES IN THIS ACTION. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 2/6/2009. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2009)
January 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL MEDIATION COUNSEL. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 1/23/2009. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2009)
September 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER. The deadline for the parties to complete Court appointed Mediation is continued from 11/3/2008 to 1/30/2009 re 22 . Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 9/30/2008. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaytan v. Chao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Gaytan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elaine Chao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?