United States of America v. Edwards et al
| United States of America |
| F. Anthony Edwards and Sharon de Edwards |
| 3:2007cv06447 |
| December 21, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Maria-Elena James |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
RELATED CASE ORDER. C 14-2852 VC Edwards v. IRS is not related to C 07-6447 MMC United States v. Edwards. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 23, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2014)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 27, 2011. The Court orders that the case management conference scheduled for September 30, 2011 is vacated. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)
|
|
Filing
62
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 16, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)
|
|
Filing
57
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Settlement Conference re-set for 8/29/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/6/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2011)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Pursuant to stipulation, the parties may reschedule the settlement conference to August 29, 2011. It is further ordered that the Case Management Conference scheduled for August 12, 2011 is continued to September 30, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 6/2/2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2011)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER RE: RE-NOTICE OF HEARING DATE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Pursuant to defendants' unopposed motion, the case management conference is continued to March 25, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 3/8/2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2011)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO RESCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for February 18, 2011 is continued to March 11, 2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 2/15/2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2011)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Pursuant to the stipulation of parties, Count III of the Amended Complaint, seeking foreclosure of the federal tax liens, is dismissed, and Defendants Contra Costa County Tax Collector, California Service Bureau, Inc., Atkinson-B aker, Inc, Mullin Law Firm, Sternberg & Coad-Hermelin, LLP, Just Water Heaters, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, California State Franchise Tax Board, Barry R. Thompson, Sun-Brite Professional Service, Inc., Javier Sanchez and Community Fund LLC, are dismissed as parties to this action. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 9/22/2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER REOPENING CASE; GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT; VACATING HEARING; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. Plaintiff's motion to amend its complaint is granted and plaintiff is directed to file its Amended Complaint no later than August 18, 2010; the hearing scheduled for August 20, 2010 is vacated. A status conference is scheduled for September 17, 2010, and the parties shall file a joint status conference statement no later than September 10, 2010. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 11, 2010. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
