Davis et al v. General Electric Company et al
| John L. Davis, William Larsen, James Pierce, Sr., Robert Schoelzel, Norris Wallace, James Watson, Robert Kacsuta and Richard Eddy |
| General Electric Company, Viad Corp., Todd Shipyards Corporation, General Dynamics Corporation and Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. |
| 3:2008cv00228 |
| January 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Riverside |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER granting 43 Notice of Voluntary Dismissalwithout prejudice filed by Richard Eddy, Richard Eddy terminated. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/23/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2014)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Hon. Jeffrey S. White no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/25/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2012)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT STATUS REPORT. Status Report due by 9/28/2012.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 9/5/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2012)
|
|
Filing
31
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER (MDL 875) by MDL Panel remanding case back to the USDC Northern District-San Francisco; Case reopened. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
