Pimentel v. Orloff et al
| Deborah J. Pimentel |
| Thomas J. Orloff, Nancy O'Malley, G Richard Klemmer, David C. Budde, County of Alameda - District Attorney's Office and The County of Alameda |
| 3:2008cv00249 |
| January 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
JUDGMENT: Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings is hereby GRANTED, and defendants request for sanctions is hereby DENIED (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2008)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, and defendants' request for sanctions is denied. As this order resolves the sole remaining claim in the action, the Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 19, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2008)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE; CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The hearing on defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is continued to November 21, 2008. The Case Management Conference is continued to January 16, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 24, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
