Federal Trade Commission v. Medlab, Inc. et al
| Federal Trade Commission |
| Medlab, Inc., Pinnacle Holdings, Inc., Metabolic Research Associates, Inc., U.S.A. Health, Inc. and L. Scott Holmes |
| 3:2008cv00822 |
| February 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Susan Illston |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER RE: FTC's PROPOSED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2009)
|
|
Filing
76
ATTACHMENT TO ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Illston on 4/21/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2009)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 3/20/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2009)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' DISCOVERY REQUEST re 62 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2009)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER by Judge Illston granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2009)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/25/2008. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
