Keck v. Bank of America et al
David Keck |
Bank of America, Central States Indemnity Co. of Omaha and CSI Processing, LLC |
3:2008cv01219 |
February 29, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Other Statutory Actions Office |
San Francisco |
Charles R. Breyer |
Both |
Federal Question |
28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER PRELIMINARY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT re 53 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement filed by David Keck, Motions terminated: 53 MOTION for Hearing on Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement filed by David Keck. Fairness Hearing set for 7/10/2009 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/26/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2009) |
Filing 50 ORDER continuing hearing dates Motion Hearing set for 3/6/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Class Certification Hearing set for 7/10/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/22/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2008) |
Filing 48 ORDER substitution of attorneys re 46 Notice of Change In Counsel filed by TRG Customer Solutions, Inc., Attorney Christopher H. Doyle for TRG Customer Solutions, Inc. added. Attorney Robert Charles Ward terminated.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/19/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.