Ursack, Inc. et al v. Sierra Interagency Black Bear Group et al
| Ursack, Inc., Jacqueline Florine, Gary Fisher and Phoenix Vamvakias |
| Sierra Interagency Black Bear Group, National Park Service, United States Forest Service, Craig Axtell, Michael Tollefson and Jim Upchurch |
| 3:2008cv01808 |
| April 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| San Francisco |
| James Larson |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 05:702 Administrative Procedure Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion to Strike ; granting 36 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 30 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2009)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER for Briefing and Hearing of Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 5/15/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2009)
|
|
Filing
26
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND ORDER - Settlement Conference set for 5/7/2009 09:30 AM. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 4/20/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2009)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 4/17/2009 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 3/2/09. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
