Upham v. The Personal Representative of the Estate of Peter M. Fox et al
| Christopher Upham |
| The Personal Representative of the Estate of Peter M. Fox and Helena Fox |
| 3:2008cv01859 |
| April 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Riverside |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
RELATED CASE ORDER. Upham v. The Personal Representative of the Estate of Peter M. Fox, et al., 08-1859, is related to Upham v. Helena M. Fox, 13-3377. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 31, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2013)
|
|
Filing
36
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Case with 13-3377-EDL. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 7/23/2013. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2013)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING 29 PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT OCTOBER 16, 2009 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2009)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANTS. Plaintiff shall serve the Second Amended Complaint and summons on defendants no later than April 20, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2009)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff is allowed leave to file, no later than March 10, 2009, his proposed second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 4, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2009)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND; DENYING MOTION TO VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. The Application for Leave to Amend is denied, without prejudice to plaintiff's making a more particula rized showing, at a later date, as to why such leave should be afforded; any such showing shall include the submission of a proposed Second Amended Complaint. The Motion to Vacate Case Management Conference is denied. Given the location of plaintif f's counsel, in Palm Springs, California, plaintiff may appear by telephone at the Case Management Conference. Plaintiff shall file a Case Management Conference Statement no later than 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 4, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 2, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
