Aureflam Corporation v. Nguyen et al
Plaintiff: Aureflam Corporation
Defendant: Tuyen Huy Nguyen, Tu Tien Nguyen and Long Cuu Vu
Case Number: 3:2008cv01910
Filed: April 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Trademark Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Bernard Zimmerman
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 49 Stipulation filed by Tuyen Huy Nguyen, Tu Tien Nguyen, Long Cuu Vu, Aureflam Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 10/19/2009. (ahy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2009)
September 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/11/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2009)
August 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 8/4/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2009)
April 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 33 Case Management Statement filed by Aureflam Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 4/27/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2009)
April 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER SCHEDULING DEFAULT JUDGMENT HEARING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 4/22/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2009)
March 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 3/11/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2009)
January 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CONTINUED TO MARCH 16, 2009 AT 4:00 P.M.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 1/9/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2009)
October 27, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 17 Motion to Vacate (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aureflam Corporation v. Nguyen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aureflam Corporation
Represented By: Charles Joseph Stiegler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tuyen Huy Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tu Tien Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Long Cuu Vu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?