Stephan v. Thomas Weisel Partners, LLC et al
| Mark Stephan |
| Thomas Weisel Partners, LLC and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America |
| 3:2008cv01935 |
| April 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Marilyn H. Patel |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 72 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice; [Proposed] Order filed by UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/31/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2013)
|
|
Filing
66
JUDGMENT; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 7/22/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2010)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM & ORDER Re: Cross-Motions on Standard of Review and Related Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 8/14/09. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2009)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Re: Supplemental Briefing. Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 2/23/09. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending deadline for completion of mediation; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 10/9/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2008)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing defendant Thomas Weisel Partners, LLC; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 8/29/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
