Continental D.I.A. Diamond Products, Inc. v. Dong Young Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. et al
Continental D.I.A. Diamond Products, Inc. |
Dong Young Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd. and Dongsoo Lee |
3:2008cv02136 |
April 24, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Trademark Office |
San Mateo |
Susan Illston |
Both |
Federal Question |
15:1051 Trademark Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 162 consent decree/injunction Modified on 3/2/2010 (tf, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 160 ORDER adjusting motion and trial schedule (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2010) |
Filing 156 ORDER adjusting schedule (as amended by the Court) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2010) |
Filing 153 ORDER SETTING NEW TRIAL SCHEDULE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2009) |
Filing 151 ORDER adjusting litigation schedule: motions set 4/2/10, pretrial set 5/18/10, jury trial set 6/1/10 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2009) |
Filing 149 ORDER adjusting trial schedule (see order for amendments) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2009) |
Filing 146 ORDER continuing trial litigation schedule (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2009) |
Filing 143 ORDER extending discovery cutoff deadlines (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2009) |
Filing 137 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES and DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS re 117 , 118 , 119 . Defendants delcaration is due 8/24/09. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2009) |
Filing 133 Order Dismissing Defendants Fifth and Seventh Causes of Action Asserted in Their Amended Counterclaims With Prejudice by Continental D.I.A. Diamond Products, Inc (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2009) |
Filing 114 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES. Defendants' responses due 7/24/09. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2009) |
Filing 99 ORDER ADJUSTING DISCOVERY CUTOFF DEADLINES (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2009) |
Filing 94 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Illston on 5/26/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2009) |
Filing 91 ORDER continuing cmc to 5/26/09 @ 4 p.m.. Signed by Judge Illston on 5/11/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2009) |
Filing 84 ORDER re 81 with signature. Signed by Judge Illston on 2/26/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2009) |
Filing 83 ORDER. Signed by Judge Illston on 2/26/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2009) |
Filing 80 ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2009) |
Filing 78 ORDER continuing trial schedule. Signed by Judge Illston on 1/15/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2009) |
Filing 73 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2008) |
Filing 68 ORDER RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2008) |
Filing 67 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY REQUEST [Docket No. 56] (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2008) |
Filing 62 ORDER extending deadline re 59 . Signed by Judge Illston on 11/18/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2008) |
Filing 58 ORDER granting extension to file reply re 55 (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting extension to file response to amended counterclaims. Signed by Judge Illston on 10/8/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2008) |
Filing 46 ORDER extending time for defendants to file and serve amended counterclaims to 9/26/08 re 45 . Signed by Judge Illston on 9/19/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.