Pagtakhan et al v. Burlingame Police Department et al
Marlon E. Pagtakhan, Joanna E. Pagtakhan, Sara Marie French and Puri E. Pagtakhan |
Burlingame Police Department, Steve Wagstaffe, Eric M. Hove, Jatinder K. Singh, Thomas E. Samuels, Jack Grandsaert and County of San Mateo |
3:2008cv02188 |
April 28, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Napa |
Susan Illston |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/24/2014) |
Filing 80 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENSE ATTORNEY AND PSYCHOLOGISTS, AND GRANTING PARTIAL LEAVE TO AMEND CLAIMS AGAINST WITT AND BPD 43 46 55 59 66 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/21/2013) |
Filing 67 ORDER PERMITTING FURTHER WRITTEN OPPOSITION TO PENDING MOTIONS, AND VACATING HEARING DATES (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/23/2013) |
Filing 39 ORDER OF SERVICE ON SOME DEFENDANTS (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/17/2013) |
Filing 35 ORDER FOR AMENDMENT OF CONSPIRACY-BASED CLAIMS (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/15/2013) |
Filing 33 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY WRESTLING DEFENDANTS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/24/2012) |
Filing 30 ORDER LIFTING STAY, RE-OPENING ACTION, AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT 29 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/2/2012) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.