Ruckus Wireless, Inc. v. Netgear, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ruckus Wireless, Inc.
Defendant: Netgear, Inc. and Rayspan Corporation
Case Number: 3:2008cv02310
Filed: May 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Patent Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:145 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 135 Claim construction order. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 12/16/2013. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2013)
July 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 114 Motion to Amend/Correct (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2013)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting 99 Motion to Strike (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2013)
December 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re 82 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Netgear, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/12/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2012)
October 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO LIFT STAY re 78 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Lift Stay filed by Ruckus Wireless, Inc. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/27/2012. Case Management Conference set for 1/3/2013 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/22/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2012)
December 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re 60 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Netgear, Inc., Rayspan Corporation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/22/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2009)
December 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER re 56 Status Report filed by Netgear, Inc., Ruckus Wireless, Inc., Rayspan Corporation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/1/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2009)
October 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING MEDIATION re 40 Stipulation and Proposed Order selecting Mediation filed by Netgear, Inc., Rayspan Corporation, Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/15/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2008)
September 26, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 39 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONCERNING MOTION TO STAY re 38 Stipulation filed by Ruckus Wireless, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/26/08. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruckus Wireless, Inc. v. Netgear, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ruckus Wireless, Inc.
Represented By: Robert Joseph Yorio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Netgear, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rayspan Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?