Jarrett et al v. InterMune Inc et al
| Jeffrey H. Frankel, Nancy Isenhower and Deborah Jane Jarrett |
| InterMune Inc, W. Scott Harkonen and Genentech Inc |
| 3:2008cv02376 |
| May 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Marilyn H. Patel |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
180
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 08/31/10. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2010)
|
|
Filing
175
STIPULATION AND ORDER allowing filing of Joan M Stevens Trust Documents under seal; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 5/25/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2010)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER granting plaintiffs' application for attorney Kristen Johnson Parker to appear pro hac vice; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 5/10/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2010)
|
|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel: Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part; Plaintiffs' claims under the UCL's fraudulent prong, the FAL, the CLRA, the consumer protection statutes of Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Da kota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and for unjust enrichment are dismissed with prejudice; Jarrett, Isenhower, Frankel, Rybkoski and Stevens's claims under Missouri's MPA are also dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiffs' claims under the UCL's unfair and unlawful prongs are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the dat e of this order and in accordance with this order. Prior to ruling on whether GEHA's FAC states a claim for relief under Missouri's MPA, the court orders simultaneous supplemental briefing from GEHA, InterMune and Harkonen in accordance with this order. The briefs shall be filed within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order and shall not exceed seven (7) pages in length. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2009)
|
|
Filing
109
STIPULATION AND ORDER setting briefing schedules re Motions to Dismiss; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 6/30/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2009)
|
|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel:The court GRANTS the parties' joint motion to adopt defendants' motions to dismiss, opposition and reply briefs from related cases. The moving papers for civil cases 08-2376, 08-2916 and 08- 3797 are deemed filed in civil action 08-4531. This order applies in all four cases. The court GRANTS defendants' motions to dismiss the complaints in their entirety. All claimsthe RICO claims, the state law claims and the unjust enrichment cl aimsare dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend as described above. Amended complaints, if any, shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Answers or other responses should be filed within thirty (30) days of the filing of the amended complaints. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2009)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting leave to file statement of recent decision; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/26/2009. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2009)
|
|
Filing
65
STIPULATION AND ORDER for the Interim Preservation of Potentially Discoverable Information; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/30/2008. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
