Boutte v. Bahr et al
| John Boutte |
| Bryon J. Bahr, Arlene T. Borick, Daimler Chrysler Financial Services America LLC, Cooksey, Tooles, Gage, Duffy and Wong |
| 3:2008cv02641 |
| May 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| San Francisco |
| Bernard Zimmerman |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 6/30/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2009)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER RE SERVICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 3/20/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2009)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER RE SERVICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 1/14/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2009)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman denying 21 Motion to Disqualify Judge (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2008)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference to 12/8/08 at 4:00p.m.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/9/08. (sv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2008)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by John Boutte, 13 Order, 9 Proposed Order filed by John Boutte. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 9/5/08. (sv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
