BrowserCam, Inc. v. Gomez, Inc.
| BrowserCam, Inc. |
| Gomez, Inc. |
| 3:2008cv02959 |
| June 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Contract: Other Office |
| San Francisco |
| William H. Alsup |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DIMISSAL; ORDER. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 3, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2009)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT [re 77 Letter filed by BrowserCam, Inc.]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 4/1/2009. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2009)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER RE ARBITRATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 3, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2009)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS by Judge William Alsup [granting 50 Motion to Compel]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2009)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER Re Parties' Letters of January 16, 2009 62 63 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/22/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2009)
|
|
Filing
56
NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/30/08. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2008)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER REFERRING ALL DISCOVERY DISPUTES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE [re 49 Letter filed by BrowserCam, Inc.]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 12/24/2008. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/24/2008)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY DISPUTE (DECEMBER 8, 2008) [re 45 Letter filed by BrowserCam, Inc.]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 12/4/2008. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2008)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER SUBJECT TO STATED CONDITIONS. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 1, 2008. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2008)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT GOMEZ, INC. TO FILE AND SERVE AN ANSWER (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2008)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER by Judge William Alsup [denying 13 Motion to Dismiss; denying 13 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 13 Motion to Transfer Case]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2008)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 5, 2008. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BrowserCam, Inc. v. Gomez, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BrowserCam, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Scott Walters |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gomez, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
