Inc21.com Corporation v. Flora et al
| Inc21.com Corporation |
| Sheila Flora, Tracy Gomez, Hubbub Inc., LRU Commtech Central, 12C-Intelligence to Communicate, Inc., Intelcon Call Center, Badoles, Inc., Pelatis BPO Solutions, Proufic Contract Central, Technocall Corp., Digicall Inc., Zynergy Solutions and Contact Central Solutions, Inc. |
| 3:2008cv02967 |
| June 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| P.I.: Other Office |
| San Francisco |
| Bernard Zimmerman |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING RELEASE OF $10,000 IN FUNDS FROM THE REGISTRY OF THE COURT TO DEFENSE COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 22, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2010)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY AND VACATING HEARING by Judge William Alsup [in case 3:08-cv-02967-WHA; granting (27) Motion to Stay in case 3:09-cv-03119-WHA]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2009)
|
|
Filing
30
JUDGMENT for plaintiff and against defendants. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 12/4/2008. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2008)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER VACATING HEARING FOR MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND REQUESTING RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 13, 2008. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
