Center for Biological Diversity v. Chertoff et al
Center for Biological Diversity |
Michael Chertoff, Craig E. Bone and United States Coast Guard |
3:2008cv02999 |
June 18, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Environmental Matters Office |
San Francisco |
Maxine M. Chesney |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
28:1331 Fed. Question |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of United States Coast Guard, Craig E. Bone, Michael Chertoff against Center for Biological Diversity. 1. To the extent plaintiff alleges violations of the ESA arising from the Coast Guards asserted implementation of o r actions under the TSS off San Francisco or the TSS in the approaches to Los Angeles-Long Beach, such claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.2. To the extent plaintiff alleges violations of the ESA arising from the Coast Gua rds asserted implementation of or actions under the TSS in the Santa Barbara Channel, or from other asserted shipping traffic management actions in the Santa Barbara Channel, defendants motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED, and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2009) |
Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 30, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2009) |
Filing 36 ORDER VACATING MARCH 6, 2009 HEARINGS; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued to April 10, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 3, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2009) |
Filing 33 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; AFFORDING PLAINTIFF OPPORTUNITY TO FILE SUR-REPLY; CONTINUING HEARING. Plaintiff shall file, no later than February 6, 2009, a combined sur-reply and response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. Defendants may file, no lat er than February 20, 2009, a reply to plaintiff's response to the Order to Show Cause. In light of the above, the hearing on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment is continued to March 6, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 20, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2009) |
Filing 30 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO LODGE CHAMBERS COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 24, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/24/2008) |
Filing 25 ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SUBMIT SINGLE-SIDED CHAMBERS COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS ELECTRONICALLY FILED IN FUTURE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 20, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2008) |
Filing 20 ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND SCHEDULE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Defendants shall file their amended answer no later than November 21, 2008, the hearing on the parties' cross-motions shall be on January 23, 2009, and the Case Management Conference is continued to March 6, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 7, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2008) |
Filing 15 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The Case Management Conference is continued to November 21, 2008, and the hearing on plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to December 12, 2008. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 4, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.