Vectren Communications Services, Inc. v. City of Alameda
Plaintiff: Vectren Communications Services, Inc.
Defendant: City of Alameda
Case Number: 3:2008cv03137
Filed: June 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 349 ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF CLERK OF COURT'S TAXATION OF COSTS 331 342 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/22/2014)
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 322 ORDER DENYING ALAMEDA'S MOTION FOR DEFENSE COSTS UNDER CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1038 313 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/27/2014)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 312 ORDER VACATING PRETRIAL DATES (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/11/2014)
February 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 310 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 284 287 289 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/7/2014)
November 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 298 ORDER granting 1-day extension of Reply Deadline. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 11/21/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2013)
May 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 265 ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2011)
March 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 258 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REDUCE CLERK OF COURT'S TAXATION OF COSTS (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2011)
March 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 257 ORDER DENYING VECTREN'S POST-TRIAL MOTIONS, DENYING ALAMEDA'S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND DENYING ALAMEDA'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL re 233 , 235 , 236 (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2011) Modified on 3/23/2011 (ys, COURT STAFF).
July 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 247 ORDER continuing motion to 7/23/10 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2010)
April 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 229 JUDGMENT (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2010)
March 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 219 ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT (case to be re-opened) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2010)
March 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 216 JUDGMENT: Judgement shall be entered in favor of Vectren Communications Services and against City of Alameda. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2010)
March 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 204 SPECIAL VERDICT FORM (FINAL) (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2010)
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 201 VERDICT FORM (PROPOSED FOR COUNSEL) (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2010)
February 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER EXCLUDING AUGUST 17, 1999 CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2010)
February 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 185 ORDER TO PAY ADDITIONAL ATTENDANCE FEE (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2010)
February 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER allowing equipment (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2010)
January 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 157 FINAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2010)
December 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 89 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2009)
October 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY re 88 , 93 , 95 , 99 , 104 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2009)
August 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 65 , 68 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2009)
May 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2009)
May 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER granting extension for discovery and mediation (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2009)
April 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER RE: DISCOVERY (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2009)
March 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER re 53 . (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2009)
March 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting leave to file 2 pg. reply. Signed by Judge Illston on 3/16/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2009)
March 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting leave to amend. re 46 Signed by Judge Illston on 3/10/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2009) Modified on 3/12/2009 (ys, COURT STAFF).
February 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 CORRECTED PRETRIAL ORDER (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2009)
December 4, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER reserving 4/24/09 motion hearing. Signed by Judge Illston on 12/3/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vectren Communications Services, Inc. v. City of Alameda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vectren Communications Services, Inc.
Represented By: Charles Griffith Towle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Alameda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?