Martin v. Cresson
Plaintiff: Carolyn Martin
Defendant: David V. Cresson
Case Number: 3:2008cv03276
Filed: July 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: American with Disabilities - Other Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 Stipulation filed by Carolyn Martin. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/20/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Cresson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Martin
Represented By: Sidney J. Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David V. Cresson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?