Finisar Corporation v. JDS Uniphase Corporation
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Defendant: JDS Uniphase Corporation
Case Number: 3:2008cv03388
Filed: July 14, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Patent Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 98 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the instant action, and, accordingly, the First Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2009)
March 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 25, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2009)
March 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER VACATING MARCH 27, 2009 HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 24, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2009)
March 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 95 DISCOVERY ORDER re 93 Letter Brief filed by JDS Uniphase Corporation. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/20/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2009)
February 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CHANGE HEARING DATE. Finisar's supplemental submission shall be filed no later than March 3, 2009. JDSU's supplemental reply shall be filed no later than March 13, 2009. The hearing on defendant's motion for summary judgment is advanced from April 3, 2009 to March 27, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 20, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2009)
February 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER AFFORDING PARTIES OPPORTUNITY TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS RE: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. No later than March 6, 2009, Finisar shall file any supplemental opposition, not to e xceed ten pages in length exclusive of exhibits. No later than March 20, 2009, JDSU shall file any supplemental reply, not to exceed ten pages in length exclusive of exhibits. The hearing on JDSU's motion is continued from February 20, 2009 to April 3, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 17, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2009)
February 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 88 SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 9, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2009)
February 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 2, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2009)
December 18, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Defendant shall file its Amended Answer to First Amended Complaint no later than December 24, 2008. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 18, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2008)
November 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 62 PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/17/2008. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2008)
October 31, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY LARRY R. LAYCOCK PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2008)
October 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY CRAIG HALL, JR. PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 30, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2008)
October 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 45 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 22, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2008)
October 21, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 21, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2008)
September 29, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL. The stipulation and joint application is denied, without prejudice to the parties' filing a renewed stipulation no later than October 6, 2008. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 29, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2008)
September 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY C. J. VEVERKA PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 15, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Finisar Corporation v. JDS Uniphase Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Finisar Corporation
Represented By: C. J Veverka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JDS Uniphase Corporation
Represented By: Kurt Edward Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?