Motorola Inc. v. Command Audio Corporation
Motorola Inc. |
Command Audio Corporation |
3:2008cv03492 |
July 21, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Patent Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Maxine M. Chesney |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2201 Declaratory Judgement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 2, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2009) |
Filing 37 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Plaintiff's deadline for responding to defendant's motion to dismiss is changed from March 27, 2009 to March 31, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 27, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2009) |
Filing 35 PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 3/9/2009. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2009) |
Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY WAYNE O. STACY PRO HAC VICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 4, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2009) |
Filing 26 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss shall be filed no later than March 8, 2009. Further, the hearing on the motion to dismiss is continued from March 20, 2009 to April 3, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 27, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2009) |
Filing 18 ORDER CONTINUING VARIOUS DEADLINES, INCLUDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Defendant has until and including February 6, 2009 to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint. The Case Management Conference is continued from Ja nuary 16, 2009 to March 6, 2009. The deadlines to meet and confer, to file an ADR certificate, and to file a Stipulation to ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference are continued to January 30, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 5, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2009) |
Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING MOTOROLA'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW JOHN DOWNING AS COUNSEL OF RECORD. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 12, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2008) |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES. The Case Management Conference is continued from October 31, 2008 to January 16, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 10, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Motorola Inc. v. Command Audio Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Motorola Inc. | |
Represented By: | Brian K. Erickson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Command Audio Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.