Jews for Jesus, Inc. et al v. City College of San Francisco et al
||Jews for Jesus, Inc. and Robert Wertheim
||City College of San Francisco and Charlton Fotch
||August 15, 2008
||US District Court for the Northern District of California
||Civil Rights: Other Office
||Marilyn H. Patel
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 28, 2009
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time to and including 6/7/2009 to file motion for attorneys' fees; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 4/28/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2009)
|January 12, 2009
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel: plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction with regard to the District's permit requirement is DENIED as moot. Such denial is WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal, should the District reenact the challenged or similar policies. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction with regard to the restriction to Ram Plaza is continued until the parties have made further evidentiary submissions to the court. Plaintiffs motion to waive t he posting of a bond is GRANTED. As discussed at oral argument, the parties SHALL meet and confer regarding a settlement of the outstanding issue or issues. No later than one week prior to the parties' next appearance, whether on the continued preliminary injunction motion or at a case management conference, they SHALL file a joint case management statement. denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; terminating 4 Motion for Bond (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2009)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?