Burton v. City of Kanab, Utah et al
| John Burton |
| City of Kanab, Utah, Kane County, Utah, State of Utah, Eric Lind, Mark Fisher and Utah State Bar |
| 3:2008cv04102 |
| August 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Constitutional - State Statute Office |
| Alameda |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 3, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2008)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER RE: LETTER FILED OCTOBER 28, 2008. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 13, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)
|
|
Filing
8
JUDGMENT: The Court finds venue is not proper in this district, and hereby DISMISSES the complaint, without prejudice to plaintiffs refiling his claims in a proper forum. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2008)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR IMPROPER VENUE. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, no later than September 26, 2008, and in writing not to exceed five pages in length, why the action should not be dismissed without prejudice based on improper venue. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 10, 2008. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
