Seastrom v. Department of the Army, San Francisco District, Corps of Engineers et al
Plaintiff: Janet B. Seastrom
Defendant: Department of the Army, San Francisco District, Corps of Engineers and Friends of the Bay Model
Case Number: 3:2008cv04108
Filed: August 28, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/23/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2009)
November 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT 11/17/09 2:30 P.M. STATUS CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/3/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2009)
August 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 Stipulation filed by Department of the Army, San Francisco District, Corps of Engineers Initial Case Management Conference reset for 9/9/2009 02:30 PM.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/20/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2009)
March 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER Granting 28 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Case. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/4/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2009)
December 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER vacating 24 Order of November 26, 2008. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on December 9, 2008. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2008)
November 26, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER Converting 5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Into Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/26/2008. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2008)
November 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 Stipulation filed by Department of the Army, San Francisco District, Corps of Engineers. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/17/08. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2008)
October 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER re 13 Motion to extend time to oppose to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Janet B. Seastrom. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/8/08. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seastrom v. Department of the Army, San Francisco District, Corps of Engineers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janet B. Seastrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of the Army, San Francisco District, Corps of Engineers
Represented By: Victoria R. Carradero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Friends of the Bay Model
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?