Rockyou, Inc. v. Commagere et al
| Rockyou, Inc. |
| Blake Commagere and Commagere Ventures, LLC |
| 3:2008cv04237 |
| September 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Copyright Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 17:101 Copyright Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued to March 6, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 6, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2009)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 18, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2008)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING. The hearing on plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction and defendant's motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay is continued to January 23, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 6, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2008)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL. The Clerk is directed to file in the public record Exhibit J to the Declaration of M. Leah Somoano in Support of Rockyou's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 27, 2008. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
