Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund et al v. Protean Health Services, Inc. et al
| Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund, Andrew Stern, Mike Garcia, Rod Bashir, Charles Ridgell, Sharleen Stewart, James Berg, Edward J. Manko, John J. Sheridan, Larry T. Smith and Frank A. Maxson |
| Protean Health Services, Inc. and LBT Horizon LLC, |
| 3:2008cv04278 |
| September 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| San Francisco |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT granting 77 Motion. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/8/2020)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER continuing cmc to 5/29/09 (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2009)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In light of plaintiffs' pending Notice of Related Case and Motion for Determination of Related Cases Pursuant to Local Rule 3-12, filed in Service Employees International Union National Industry Pensi on Fund v. Protean Health Services, Inc., C 03-4245 SI, the Case Management Conference is continued from January 23, 2009 to February 13, 2009. No further Joint Case Management Statement is required. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 21, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
