Yanke v. City of Oakland et al
| Christopher Yanke |
| City of Oakland, Wayne Tucker, Debra Taylor Johnson, Kenneth Parris and Stephen Raffle |
| 3:2008cv04379 |
| September 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Alameda |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting 103 Motion to Dismiss (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2010)
|
|
Filing
99
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Continue the Deadline to Exchange Initial Disclosures to April 19, 2010 Signed by Mag. Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte re 98 Stipulation. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2010)
|
|
Filing
95
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 94 Stipulation, filed by Kenneth Parris, Wayne Tucker, Debra Taylor Johnson, City of Oakland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on November 12, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2009)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER STAYING CASE AS TO CITY DEFENDANTS AND GRANTING DEFENDANT RAFFLE'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte terminating 64 Motion to Dismiss; granting 67 Motion to Dismiss (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2009)
|
|
Filing
86
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 85 Stipulation filed by Stephen Raffle. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on August 12, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2009)
|
|
Filing
82
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE the Deadline to Exchange Initial Disclosures to 7/28/2009 re 81 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 7/1/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2009)
|
|
Filing
62
STIPULATION AND ORDER ALLOWING Third Amended Complaint for filing on 4/24/2009 re 61 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 4/23/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2009)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on April 16, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2009)
|
|
Filing
56
STIPULATION AND ORDER [AS MODIFIED] CONTINUING Deadline to Exchange Initial Disclosures and Initial Case Management Conference to 6/30/2009 10:00 AM. Joint case management statement due 6/23/2009. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/23/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2009)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 35 Stipulation, filed by Stephen Raffle. Case Management Conference set for March 24, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on January 26, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2009)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND GRANTING BRIEF EXTENSION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on January 15, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2009)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Stipulation filed by Stephen Raffle. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on January 5, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2009)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER [As Modified] TO CONTINUE Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Deadline to Exchange Initial Disclosures re 13 . Initial Case Management Conference continued to 1/27/2009 03:00 PM. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 12/3/08. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2008)
|
|
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED re 11 Stipulation filed by Christopher Yanke. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on November 6, 2008. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2008)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
