Kerner v. Mendez et al
Mary C. Kerner |
Jorge Mendez, Patrick Philips and United Airlines (UAL) |
3:2008cv04528 |
September 29, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
American with Disabilities - Other Office |
Marin |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting 39 Motion to Dismiss (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2009) |
Filing 40 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING Time for Defendant United Airlines, Inc. to Answer Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint re 38 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 6/17/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2009) |
Filing 35 ORDER TAKING PLAINTIFF'S PETITION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL UNDER SUBMISSION; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte taking under advisement 30 Motion for Certificate of Appealability; granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2009) |
Filing 27 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting 20 Motion to Dismiss (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2009) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME for Defendant United Airlines to Answer Plaintiff's Amended Complaint re 18 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 3/2/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.