Guo v. Color Tech Corporation et al
Xiaojin (Jean) Guo |
Color Tech Corporation, Kingston Ku and Andover Printing Services Ltd. |
3:2008cv04923 |
October 28, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Labor: Fair Standards Office |
San Francisco |
Phyllis J. Hamilton |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER RE BANKRUPTCY STAY re 29 Notice (Other) filed by Xiaojin (Jean) Guo. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/27/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2009) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ANDOVER PRINTING SERVICES re 25 Stipulation filed by Xiaojin (Jean) Guo. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/6/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2009) |
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 21 Letter filed by Andover Printing Services Ltd. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/30/2009. Case Management Conference set for 5/7/2009 02:30 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/14/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2009) |
Filing 20 ORDER SCHEDULING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/1/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2009) |
Filing 18 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 2/9/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.