Conner et al v. General Electric Company et al
| Cleo Ann Conner, Timothy Conner, James Conner, Sam David Wyatt, Brooke West and Michelle Wyatt |
| General Electric Company and Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company |
| 3:2008cv04926 |
| October 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Marin |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER Granting re 20 Request for Dismissal of Defendant General Electric Company, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on August 29, 2012. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2012)
|
|
Filing
18
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER remanding case back from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI), MDL No. 875, and CASE REOPENED. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
16
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-318) by The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation TRANSFERRING CASE to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania & Assigned to the Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1407, MDL No. 875.***Civil Case Terminated. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
