National Lawyers' Guild San Francisco Chapter et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Plaintiff: National Lawyers' Guild San Francisco Chapter, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Southern California and National Immigration Law Center
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Office of the Inspector General, United States Department of Justice and Executive Office for Immigration Review
Case Number: 3:2008cv05137
Filed: November 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Freedom of Information Act Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Breyer
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 05:552 Right to Privacy Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 74 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 73 to Extend Time to File Bill of Costs and/or Motion for Attorney's Fees. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/31/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2012)
April 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 72 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 70 TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/26/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012)
March 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 68 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 67 TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/7/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2012)
February 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 66 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 65 TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/29/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2012)
January 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 63 EXTEND TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/27/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2012)
November 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 62 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 61 TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/29/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2011)
September 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 60 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 59 TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/29/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2011)
June 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 58 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BILL OF COSTS AND/OR MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/30/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011)
June 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 54 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/1/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2011)
April 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/4/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2011)
February 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/3/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2011)
January 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 47 JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/7/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2011)
August 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER RE: JOINT STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/27/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2010)
May 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 40 TO STAY PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/3/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2010)
February 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER to Stay Proceedings thru and including 4/30/2010 re 36 Status Report, filed by Office of the Inspector General, Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/2/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2010)
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER to Stay Proceedings thru and including 1/30/2010 re 33 Status Report, filed by Office of the Inspector General, Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/10/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2009)
April 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER re 27 Stipulation, filed by Office of the Inspector General, Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security, Motions terminated:. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/27/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2009)
March 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER for filing of first amended complaint re 22 Stipulation, filed by National Immigration Law Center, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Southern California, National Lawyers' Guild San Francisco Chapter. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/25/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2009) Modified on 3/27/2009 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
February 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER for exemption from formal ADR process re 14 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options filed by Office of the Inspector General, Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/3/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: National Lawyers' Guild San Francisco Chapter et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: National Lawyers' Guild San Francisco Chapter
Represented By: Karen Cassandra Tumlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Southern California
Represented By: Karen Cassandra Tumlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: National Immigration Law Center
Represented By: Karen Cassandra Tumlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Customs and Border Protection
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of the Inspector General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Executive Office for Immigration Review
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?