v. Fagerlin
| 3:2008cv05225 |
| November 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| Solano |
| Edward M. Chen |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice upon settlement. Within 90 days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred, the foregoing order shall be vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2009)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SUM FROM TRUST (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2009)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER STAYING AND ENJOINING PROSECUTION OF ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING AGAINST PLAINTIFF OR PLAINTIFF'S PROPERTY WITH RESPECT TO ANY CLAIM SUBJECT TO LIMITATION IN THIS ACTION (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2009)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 2 , 11 . (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2009)
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Re 2 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Orders. Objections to R&R due by 2/6/2009. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/23/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: v. Fagerlin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
