Mitrick v. County of Sonoma et al
Michael E. Mitrick |
County of Sonoma, Bill Cogbill, Sonoma County Jail, J. Mahoney and DOES 2-100 |
3:2008cv05306 |
March 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Thelton E. Henderson |
Maria-Elena James |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 Stipulation and ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 06/10/10. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2010) |
Filing 41 NOTICE OF REFERENCE FOR DISCOVERY PURPOSES re 40 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge for Discovery. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/19/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2010) |
Filing 36 ORDER CHANGING TIME OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge James Larson on 10/13/09. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2009) |
Filing 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER re: ADR process. Case is removed from mediation and referred to a Magistrate Judge for Settlement. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 07/15/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2009) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER for filing of second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 06/11/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2009) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting request for telephonic appearance at the case management conference. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 03/26/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.