Patterson v. Small
Petitioner: Norman E. Patterson
Respondent: Larry Small
Case Number: 3:2008cv05423
Filed: December 2, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Imperial
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER DENYING 24 CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 20, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2011)
May 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 10, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011)
October 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING 18 PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL AND CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 21, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2010)
August 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Larry Small against Norman E. Patterson, the respondents motion to dismiss the petition as untimely is hereby GRANTED. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2010)
October 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING 7 RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 23, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2009)
July 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order, the petition and all attachments thereto on respondent and respondent's counsel, the Attorney General for the State o f California. Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on petitioner, within ninety (90) days of the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted based on petitioner's cognizable claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 17, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2009) Modified on 7/20/2009 (aaa, COURT STAFF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson v. Small
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Norman E. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Larry Small
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?