Cordona v. Rien's Sandy Beach et al
Richard Cordona |
Rien's Sandy Beach, Robert Dixon and Carol Shumate |
3:2008cv05566 |
December 12, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Civil Rights: Accomodations Office |
Sonoma |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:405 Fair Housing Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER Re Supplemental Materials. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/20/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2009) |
Filing 36 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The parties having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of the action, it is ordered that plaintiff's claims be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered, this order shall stand vacated and the action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 11, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2009) |
Filing 33 ORDER - Notice and Order Setting Further Settlement Conference. Further Settlement Conference set for 4/23/2009 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/9/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2009) |
Filing 30 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANTS' SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE. The hearing on plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction and defendants' motion to strike is continued from March 27, 2009 to May 15, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 24, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2009) |
Filing 28 ORDER - Notice and Order Setting Further Settlement Conference. Further Settlement Conference set for 3/30/2009 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/20/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2009) |
Filing 26 ORDER - Amended/Corrected Notice of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order. Settlement Conference set for 2/20/2009 09:30 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/6/2009. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2009) |
Filing 24 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE, AND TO REFER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The hearing on plaint iff's motion for preliminary injunction and on defendants' motion to strike is continued from February 27, 2009 to March 27, 2009. Defendants shall not serve any termination notices or otherwise attempt to terminate plaintiff's tenancy while the parties are exploring early resolution of the matter. The parties are referred to Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen for purposes of an early settlement conference. The Case Management Conference is continued from March 20, 2009 to April 24, 2009; a Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than April 17, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 5, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2009) |
Filing 22 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO HEAR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Plaintiff's motion for an order shortening time is denied, and plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction shall be heard on February 27, 2009. Signee by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 28, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.