NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc. v. Agere Systems Inc. et al
Plaintiff: NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc.
Defendant: LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc
Case Number: 3:2008cv05682
Filed: December 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Patent Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:145 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from November 20, 2009 to January 8, 2010. A Supplemental Joint Case Management Statement, including a status report on the parties' settlement discussions, shall be filed not less than ten days prior to the conference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 13, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2009)
October 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from October 16, 2009 to November 20, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 8, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2009)
April 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 14, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2009)
March 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION SETTING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO AMEND ANSWER AND FOR PLAINTIFF TO ANSWER ALL COUNTERCLAIMS. Defendants shall amend the answer to add counterclaims that assert patents no later than April 1, 2009, and plaintiff shall answer the existing and all additional counterclaims no later than April 15, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 9, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2009)
January 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RELATED CASE ORDER. The Court has reviewed the motion and determined no cases are related and no reassignment shall occur. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2009)
January 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RELATE. The Court DENIES the Motion to relate case 3:08-cv-05682-MMC NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc. v. Agere Systems Inc. et al with 5:08-cv-00775-JW NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc. -v- LSI Corporation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/13/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc. v. Agere Systems Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc.
Represented By: Brett Michael Schuman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LSI Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Agere Systems Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?