Yafai v. Amtrak
Plaintiff: Abdulhakim Saleh Ali Yafai
Defendant: Amtrak
Case Number: 3:2008cv05715
Filed: December 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth D. Laporte
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting 37 Motion to Dismiss (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2009)
February 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting 7 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. (wh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yafai v. Amtrak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abdulhakim Saleh Ali Yafai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amtrak
Represented By: Liza C Siu Mendoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?