Luippold v. Rockwell International, Inc. et al
Michael J. Luippold |
Rockwell International, Inc., Rockwell Manufacturing, Orsen Porter Rockwell International, Porter-Cable Tool & Equipment Sales Co., Porter-Cable Corporation and Delta International Machinery Corporation |
3:2008cv05724 |
December 23, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
San Francisco |
Maria-Elena James |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES; VACATING HEARING. The matter is remanded to the Superior Court of California, in and for the County of Alameda; Luippold is awarded his attorney's fees as against Delta in the sum of $2362.50. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 23, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2009) |
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE. The hearing on defendant's motion to strike is continued from February 13, 2009 to February 27, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 5, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2009) |
Filing 21 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 2, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.