Canas et al v. City of Sunnyvale et al
| Erika Canas, Jose Canas and Jesus Canas |
| City of Sunnyvale, Chris Searle and Darren Pang |
| 5:2008cv05771 |
| December 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Patricia V. Trumbull |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
167
STIPULATION AND ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice of the Entire Action. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 11/05/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2012)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER denying as moot Defendants' rule 50 motion. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/21/2012. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2012)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion in Limine; granting 116 Motion in Limine; dismissing 117 Motion in Limine; granting 118 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 119 Motion in Limine; denying 120 Motion in Limine; denying 121 Motion in Limine; granting 122 Motion in Limine; denying 123 Motion in Limine; dismissing 124 Motion in Limine; granting 128 Motion in Limine. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2012)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER Authorizing Electronic Equipment at Trial re 140 . Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 09/06/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2012)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER on trial rules and procedures. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2012)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 8/27/2012 03:00 PM. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/23/2012. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2012)
|
|
Filing
110
NOTICE of intended ruling on 100 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/09/12. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2012)
|
|
Filing
93
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING TRIAL SCHEDULE re 92 Pretrial Conference set for 7/6/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Jeremy Fogel. Jury Selection set for 9/10/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Jeremy Fogel. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/10/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011)
|
|
Filing
88
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 87 . Case Management Conference set for 6/24/2011 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose.. Signed by Juge Jeremy Fogel on 5/10/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2011)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER GRANTING CITY'S MOTION 78 TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on January 19, 2011.
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER Granting 62 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, with Leave to Amend by Judge Jeremy Fogel. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2010)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER APPROVING 67 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE, AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Motion Hearing and Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2010 are CONTINUED to 8/27/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/24/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2010)
|
|
Filing
65
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT (approving 64 ). The Case Management Conference set for 5/14/2010 is CONTINUED to 7/9/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/6/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER by Judge Jeremy Fogel granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Dismiss, with leave to amend in part. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2010)
|
|
Filing
54
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (approving 53 ). The Motion Hearing and Case Management Conference set for 1/15/2010 are CONTINUED to 3/12/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/4/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2010)
|
|
Filing
52
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (approving 48 ). The Motion To Dismiss and Case Management Conference are set for 1/15/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/22/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2009)
|
|
Filing
51
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TIME FOR EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION re 47 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/22/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2009)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER RE PARTIES' STIPULATION AND PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on October 15, 2009. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2009)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER GRANTING 31 MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/20/09. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2009)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (approving 35 ). The Case Management Conference set for 7/17/2009 is CONTINUED to 9/4/2009 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/2/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2009)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL GRANTING 18 MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2009)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 22 Stipulation Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation, Case referred to early neutral evaluation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/29/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
