Lilak v. Pfizer Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff: Safdar Lilak
Defendant: Pfizer Corporation, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv05777
Filed: December 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Breyer
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 28 Motion for Judicial Review (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2012)
June 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on June 24, 2010. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2010)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lilak v. Pfizer Corporation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Safdar Lilak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pfizer Corporation, Inc.
Represented By: Patricia A. Fennelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?