Currey v. Homecoming Financial, LLC
Plaintiff: Duane Currey
Defendant: Homecoming Financial, LLC
Case Number: 3:2009cv00276
Filed: January 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Truth in Lending Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: Bernard Zimmerman
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER by Judge Hamilton Granting 7 Motion to Dismiss. (pjhlc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2009)
February 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 BRIEFING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 2/17/2009. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Currey v. Homecoming Financial, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Duane Currey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Homecoming Financial, LLC
Represented By: Edward Scott Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?