Preferred Employers Insurance Company v. United States Postal Service et al
Preferred Employers Insurance Company |
United States Postal Service and Tim Munsil |
3:2009cv00346 |
January 26, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
P.I.: Other Office |
San Diego |
Joseph C. Spero |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
28:2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 1, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2010) |
Filing 38 ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH MODIFICATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 1, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010) |
Filing 35 ORDER REQUESTING STATUS UPDATE. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 21, 2009. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2009) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND STAYING CASE PENDING RESOLUTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2009) |
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING re 9 Request for Relief from Case Management Schedule filed by Preferred Employers Insurance Company. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 05/08/09 at 1:30 PM has been rescheduled for 7/31/2009 at 01:30 PM. Joint cmc statement due by 7/24/9. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/6/9. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2009) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.