Doughty et al v. Manrigue et al
| Samara Doughty |
| Manrigue, Knudsen, Fredstrom, Ray Samuels and City of Newark |
| 3:2009cv00425 |
| January 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Alameda |
| Phyllis J. Hamilton |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/26/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2010)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 36 Stipulation filed by Samara Doughty. Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/20/2010. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/27/2010 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/28/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2010)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER selecting ADR process. Case referred to arbitration. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 06/11/09. (rbe, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2009)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 4/23/2009. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2009)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 14 Stipulation filed by City of Newark, Manrigue, Fredstrom, Ray Samuels, Knudsen. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 4/16/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
