Crosthwaite et al v. Statewide Concrete Pumping, Inc. et al
||Gil Crosthwaite, Russ Burns, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers' Health & Welfare Fund, Operating Engineers & Participating Employers Pre-Apprenticeship, Apprentice & Journeymen Affirmative Action Training Fund, Heavy & Highway Committee and Operating Engineers Local 3
||Statewide Concrete Pumping, Inc. and Anthony Evans
||February 9, 2009
||US District Court for the Northern District of California
||Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office
||Elizabeth D. Laporte
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 15, 2009
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Heavy & Highway Committee, Operating Engineers & Participating Employers Pre-Apprenticeship, Apprentice & Journeymen Affirmative Action Training Fund, Operating Engineers Local 3, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Eng ineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers' Health & Welfare Fund, Gil Crosthwaite, Russ Burns against Statewide Concrete Pumping, Inc., Tyrone Anthony Evans. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants in conformity with the Court's order of June 11, 2009. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2009)
|June 11, 2009
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; VACATING HEARING. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order compelling defendants to submit to an audit, the motion is granted; defendants are ord ered to submit to an audit within 30 days of the date of this order. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order directing defendants to pay all amounts found by plaintiffs to be due on audit, the motion is denied as premature and without prejudice to pla intiffs' filing an action to recover any amounts claimed to be due. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order awarding attorneys' fees in the amount of $3673 and costs in the amount of $502.21, for a total sum of $4175.21, the Court grants the motion. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 11, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2009)
|May 20, 2009
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Plaintiffs are directed to file, no later than June 12, 2009, a motion for default judgment. The Case Management Conference is continued from May 22, 2009 to August 21, 2009; a Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than August 14, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 20, 2009. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2009)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?