McClendon v. Tilton
Petitioner: Andre D. McClendon
Respondent: James Tilton
Case Number: 3:2009cv00647
Filed: February 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING 23 PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE; DENYING 23 PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 27, 2012.(mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2012)
December 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING 14 RESPONDENT'S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION AS UNEXHAUSTED; DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE SECOND AMENDED PETITION OR REQUEST FOR STAY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 13, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2011)
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 26, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2011)
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING 5 MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION AS UNEXHAUSTED; DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AMENDED PETITION OR REQUEST FOR STAY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 27, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2010)
August 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order, the petition and all attachments thereto on respondent and respondent's counsel, the Attorney General for the State of California. Respondent shall file with this Court and serve on petitioner, within ninety (90) days of the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted based on petitioner's cognizable claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 12, 2009. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2009) Modified on 8/13/2009 (aaa, COURT STAFF).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McClendon v. Tilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andre D. McClendon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Tilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?