Turner v. Lafond et al
Plaintiff: Derek E. Turner
Defendant: Kris Lafond and Meg Planka
Case Number: 3:2009cv00683
Filed: February 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Bernard Zimmerman
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 134 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 133 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/20/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2012)
September 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER RESETTING CMC FROM 9/14/12 TO 11/2/12 AT 10:30 A.M. Case Management Statement due by 10/26/2012. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/2/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/12/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2012)
January 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 122 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/30/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2012)
January 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 117 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel granting in part and denying in part 67 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 71 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 80 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 101 Motion to Strike/objections (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2011)
May 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 STIPULATION AND ORDER extending close of discovery to 7/12/2010 and modifying briefing schedules on motions for summary judgment; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 5/27/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2010)
October 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel: Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend is GRANTED to permit the addition of Mari Toban Blome as plaintiff, the addition of the Commissioner and the Bridge District as defendants, and the addition of the eleventh claim for injunctive relief by plaintiff Blome. The court also GRANTS the plaintiffs' request to file a Corrected First Amended Complaint to remove the Commissioner as a defendant in the second cause of action and to clarify that the eleventh claim for relief is brought solely by Blome. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turner v. Lafond et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derek E. Turner
Represented By: Daniel Edward Purcell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kris Lafond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meg Planka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?