Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Terry et al
Plaintiff: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Defendant: Sherman Terry and Custom Access, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv01075
Filed: March 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Copyright Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Marilyn H. Patel
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Adobe Systems Incorporated against Custom Access, Inc., Sherman Terry. 1. Defendants are jointly and severally liable to plaintiff for damages in the amount of $250,000, plus post-judgment interest thereon.2. De fendants, their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of this injunction are hereby restrained and enjoined from infringing plaintiffs Copyrights, identified in Exhibit A, and Trademarks, identified in Exhibit B, either directly or contributorily in any manner, including generally, but not limited to, manufacturing, importing, distributing, advertising, selling and/or offering for sale any merchandise that features any of plaintiffs Copyrights and Trademarks. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2009)
October 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER VACATING OCTOBER 30, 2009 HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT; DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 23, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2009)
October 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING 21 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO VACATE OCTOBER 16, 2009 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 6, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2009)
August 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued to October 16, 2009. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than October 9, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 5, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2009)
June 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued to August 14, 2009. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 12, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Terry et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Represented By: Nicole Lynn Drey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sherman Terry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Custom Access, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?