Hilton v. Washington Mutual Bank et al
| Stanley G. Hilton |
| Washington Mutual Bank, Long Beach Mortgage Company, Fidelity Title Company, First American Title Company and Appraisers A and B |
| 3:2009cv01191 |
| March 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Real Property: Foreclosure Office |
| San Francisco |
| Susan Illston |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 12:1819 Default of Promissory Note |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
JUDGMENT: The Court has dismissed plailntiff's claims without leave to amend. Judgment is entered accordingly. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2010)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER GRANTING FDIC'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS FILED BY FIDELITY NATIONAL AND FIRST AMERICAN; AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND re 37 , 42 , 50 . Amended Complaint is due 11/20/09. (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2009)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR 60 DAY CONTINUANCE (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2009)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER continuing cmc to 8/7/09 @ 2:30. Signed by Judge Illston on 7/1/09. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2009)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting pro hac vice (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2009)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER granting application for admission of attorney pro hac vice (Stephen Ng). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/7/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2009)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
